Popular posts
When a Kubernetes Operator Makes Sense

Beyond YAML: Real-World Lessons from Managing Complex Infrastructure
There are plenty of ways to deploy applications onto Kubernetes:
- raw
kubectl apply - Kustomize overlays
- Helm charts
- sidecars and init containers
- and, at the far end of the spectrum, fully-fledged operators
Most teams start at the simple end and stay there. And they should, most applications don’t need anything more complicated than a Deployment, a few ConfigMaps, and a
kubectl apply -k.kubernetes operator-pattern vault devops platform-engineering
- raw
About 19 years ago, I set up a blog on Google’s Blogger platform to track my adventures learning Java: https://javaadventure.blogspot.com/
The platform has changed a lot since then, and not always for the better. Many posts no longer render the way they used to, and a few images have disappeared entirely.
One feature I really loved, which is now broken, was the ability to email a special address and have the message automatically turned into a post. It made publishing effortless… though that was also before I discovered what was then X (née Twitter).
Another interesting tidbit:
@Benchmark public void debug1Arg_date(Blackhole blackhole) { LOGGER.debug("Started at %s", new Date(time)); time++; blackhole.consume(time); } @Benchmark public void guardedDebug1Arg_date(Blackhole blackhole) { if (LOGGER.isDebugEnabled()) { LOGGER.debug("Started at %s", new Date(time)); } time++; blackhole.consume(time); }Gives the following benchmark results:
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units Log4jBenchmark.debug1Arg_date thrpt 20 179653191.248 ± 2731044.349 ops/s Log4jBenchmark.guardedDebug1Arg_date thrpt 20 207001790.376 ± 2074020.617 ops/sWe can also compare guarding with SLF4J over logback
One of my colleagues had a question:
Now for some context, when the Jenkins project started off, Kohsuke was working for Sun and felt it would be wrong, as a Sun employee, to use a logging framework other than that provided by the JVM as using a different logging framework could be seen as being implication that the built in Java Utils Logging framework was a steaming pile of excrement.
You asked for it.
Logback:
@Benchmark public void debug1Arg_date(Blackhole blackhole) { LOGGER.debug("Started at {}", new Date(time)); time++; blackhole.consume(time); } @Benchmark public void debug2Arg_date(Blackhole blackhole) { LOGGER.debug("Started at {}", new Date(time), null); time++; blackhole.consume(time); } @Benchmark public void debugNArg_date(Blackhole blackhole) { LOGGER.debug("Started at {}", new Date(time), null, null); time++; blackhole.consume(time); } static { ch.qos.logback.classic.Logger root = (ch.qos.logback.classic.Logger)LoggerFactory.getLogger(org.slf4j.Logger.ROOT_LOGGER_NAME); root.setLevel(ch.qos.logback.classic.Level.INFO); }And the benchmarks
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units LogbackBenchmark.debug1Arg_date thrpt 20 221056534.656 ± 8549233.826 ops/s LogbackBenchmark.debug2Arg_date thrpt 20 220576341.742 ± 3778270.898 ops/s LogbackBenchmark.debugNArg_date thrpt 20 134887126.088 ± 2973182.812 ops/sJUL over SLF4J (same benchmark code but different dependency)
If there are two only things guaranteed to cause all out war between developers, my vote is that those two things are:
Code formatting conventions
Version number conventions
The first is resolved trivially (just shoot anyone suggesting the use of TABs). Until recently most people thought the second was resolved by semver… at least until the developer of one of the more commonly used JavaScript libraries threw the cat amongst the pigeons.